🎉 We hit $10M ARR!

$600k to $10m in 1.5 years. Our entire GTM is powered by our own APIs.

Data

Delivery Methods

Use Cases

Solutions

Sign In

🎉 We hit $10M ARR in 1.5 years!

Sign In

🎉 We hit $10M ARR!

$600k to $10m in 1.5 years. Our entire GTM is powered by our own APIs.

Sign In

Juicebox alternative

The Best Juicebox Alternative for Recruiting Teams

Juicebox made plain-English candidate search easy. Crustdata gives recruiting teams the real-time data layer to build that search, and the rest of their sourcing, on their own terms.

If you are sourcing in Juicebox today, that plain-English search box is where most of the work happens. Many teams reach a point where it becomes the ceiling. Crustdata gives those teams a real-time data layer to build their own sourcing on, instead of working inside a fixed search interface. You decide the filters, the scoring, and the output.

If you are sourcing in Juicebox today, that plain-English search box is where most of the work happens. Many teams reach a point where it becomes the ceiling. Crustdata gives those teams a real-time data layer to build their own sourcing on, instead of working inside a fixed search interface. You decide the filters, the scoring, and the output.

If you are sourcing in Juicebox today, that plain-English search box is where most of the work happens. Many teams reach a point where it becomes the ceiling. Crustdata gives those teams a real-time data layer to build their own sourcing on, instead of working inside a fixed search interface. You decide the filters, the scoring, and the output.

• crustdata connected

Find me senior robotics engineers who have shipped on real hardware.


Rank them on: hardware they have actually shipped,

then years in robotics, then whether they look open to moving.

• crustdata connected

Find me senior robotics engineers who have shipped on real hardware.


Rank them on: hardware they have actually shipped,

then years in robotics, then whether they look open to moving.

RANKED ON YOUR RUBRIC

RANKED ON YOUR RUBRIC

used Crustdata /candidate-sourcing

used Crustdata /candidate-sourcing

Daniel R

Senior Robotics SWE

·

moved 3w ago

94

Daniel R

Senior Robotics SWE

·

moved 3w ago

94

Daniel R

Senior Robotics SWE

·

moved 3w ago

94

Gia

Staff Percepton Eng

·

open to work

88

Gia

Staff Percepton Eng

·

open to work

88

Gia

Staff Percepton Eng

·

open to work

88

Samuel M

ML Engineer

·

perception

61

Samuel M

ML Engineer

·

perception

61

Samuel M

ML Engineer

·

perception

61

Real-time

Real-time

Continuously refreshed people and company data, current at the moment you query

Continuously refreshed people and company data, current at the moment you query

Real-time

Continuously refreshed people and company data, current at the moment you query

API, webhooks, MCP

API, webhooks, MCP

Build sourcing into your own workflow, with or without engineers

Build sourcing into your own workflow, with or without engineers

API, webhooks, MCP

Build sourcing into your own workflow, with or without engineers

Usage-based

Usage-based

and tagged — strong, possible, or weak on every result, one call

and tagged — strong, possible, or weak on every result, one call

Usage-based

and tagged — strong, possible, or weak on every result, one call

01 · At a glance

Juicebox vs Crustdata at a glance

Juicebox

Juicebox is an AI candidate sourcing tool. Its natural-language search, branded PeopleGPT, lets recruiters describe who they want in plain English and search across 800M+ professional profiles drawn from 30+ data sources, instead of writing Boolean strings.

Juicebox is an AI candidate sourcing tool. Its natural-language search, branded PeopleGPT, lets recruiters describe who they want in plain English and search across 800M+ professional profiles drawn from 30+ data sources, instead of writing Boolean strings.

Juicebox

Juicebox is an AI candidate sourcing tool. Its natural-language search, branded PeopleGPT, lets recruiters describe who they want in plain English and search across 800M+ professional profiles drawn from 30+ data sources, instead of writing Boolean strings.

Crustdata

Crustdata delivers live candidate and company data through APIs, webhooks, and bulk datasets, so a recruiting team can build sourcing directly into its own workflow. The same data also runs inside Claude through MCP, which lowers the technical bar for teams without engineers.

Crustdata delivers live candidate and company data through APIs, webhooks, and bulk datasets, so a recruiting team can build sourcing directly into its own workflow. The same data also runs inside Claude through MCP, which lowers the technical bar for teams without engineers.

Crustdata

Crustdata delivers live candidate and company data through APIs, webhooks, and bulk datasets, so a recruiting team can build sourcing directly into its own workflow. The same data also runs inside Claude through MCP, which lowers the technical bar for teams without engineers.

Dimension

Dimension

Juicebox

Juicebox

Crustdata

Crustdata

What it is

What it is

AI candidate sourcing tool, plain-English search branded PeopleGPT

AI candidate sourcing tool, plain-English search branded PeopleGPT

Real-time B2B data API and data layer

Real-time B2B data API and data layer

How you use it

How you use it

Work inside its search interface

Work inside its search interface

APIs, webhooks, and bulk datasets, or in Claude via MCP

APIs, webhooks, and bulk datasets, or in Claude via MCP

Data model

Data model

Aggregated database, 800M+ profiles from 30+ sources

Aggregated database, 800M+ profiles from 30+ sources

Real-time, continuously refreshed

Real-time, continuously refreshed

Delivery

Delivery

Web interface

Web interface

APIs, webhooks (Watcher), bulk datasets

APIs, webhooks (Watcher), bulk datasets

Fits your own workflow

Fits your own workflow

Limited to the interface

Limited to the interface

Build your own, including Claude and MCP

Build your own, including Claude and MCP

Recruiting features

Recruiting features

Natural-language search across 800M+ profiles

Natural-language search across 800M+ profiles

Natural language plus 60+ filters, any criteria combination

Natural language plus 60+ filters, any criteria combination

Data depth

Data depth

Aggregated profile records

Aggregated profile records

Full work history with dates, education, skills, 200+ data points

Full work history with dates, education, skills, 200+ data points

Recruiting workflow

Recruiting workflow

Shortlisting and outreach in the interface

Shortlisting and outreach in the interface

Recruiting skills in Claude, talent-movement watchers, your own scoring

Recruiting skills in Claude, talent-movement watchers, your own scoring

02 · The ceiling

Where Juicebox works well, and where teams outgrow it

Where it works well

Juicebox is fast for plain-English candidate search, which is why teams reach for it early. You type who you want in everyday language and get a list back in seconds, with almost no setup. For ad-hoc sourcing, a quick shortlist, or a one-off role, that speed is real and worth having.

Juicebox is fast for plain-English candidate search, which is why teams reach for it early. You type who you want in everyday language and get a list back in seconds, with almost no setup. For ad-hoc sourcing, a quick shortlist, or a one-off role, that speed is real and worth having.

Where it works well

Juicebox is fast for plain-English candidate search, which is why teams reach for it early. You type who you want in everyday language and get a list back in seconds, with almost no setup. For ad-hoc sourcing, a quick shortlist, or a one-off role, that speed is real and worth having.

Where teams outgrow it

Teams outgrow Juicebox when they need to shape the underlying data, keep it current, and build it into their own sourcing workflow rather than work inside one search interface. A few limits tend to show up as a team grows.

Teams outgrow Juicebox when they need to shape the underlying data, keep it current, and build it into their own sourcing workflow rather than work inside one search interface. A few limits tend to show up as a team grows.

You work inside its interface, so you cannot reshape the data or control how results are scored and returned.

You work inside its interface, so you cannot reshape the data or control how results are scored and returned.

It runs on an aggregated profile database, and aggregated databases can age between refreshes. Juicebox does not publish an update cadence.

It runs on an aggregated profile database, and aggregated databases can age between refreshes. Juicebox does not publish an update cadence.

You cannot build it into your own tooling or an automated workflow.

You cannot build it into your own tooling or an automated workflow.

Cost scales per seat and per agent, as the team grows.

Cost scales per seat and per agent, as the team grows.

Where teams outgrow it

Teams outgrow Juicebox when they need to shape the underlying data, keep it current, and build it into their own sourcing workflow rather than work inside one search interface. A few limits tend to show up as a team grows.

You work inside its interface, so you cannot reshape the data or control how results are scored and returned.

It runs on an aggregated profile database, and aggregated databases can age between refreshes. Juicebox does not publish an update cadence.

You cannot build it into your own tooling or an automated workflow.

Cost scales per seat and per agent, as the team grows.

"senior robotics engineers, open to moving"

INSIDE A FIXED INTERFACE

One list

as returned

Their scoring

not shown

Nothing to build on

UI only

ON A DATA LAYER

Your filters

60+

Your scoring

200+ fields

Your output

API · webhook · MCP

"senior robotics engineers, open to moving"

INSIDE A FIXED INTERFACE

One list

as returned

Their scoring

not shown

Nothing to build on

UI only

ON A DATA LAYER

Your filters

60+

Your scoring

200+ fields

Your output

API · webhook · MCP

None of this makes Juicebox a poor tool. It is a strong search interface that fits some teams well. The question is whether a search box is where your sourcing should live as you scale. If you want to see how the field lines up, Crustdata's main alternatives comparison lays it out.

Same plain-English query. One surface hands you a list; the other hands you the data.

03 · What's different

How Crustdata is different:
real-time data you build sourcing on

Crustdata delivers candidate and company data through APIs, webhooks, and bulk datasets, with ready-made recruiting skills that run in Claude, watchers for talent movement, and scoring you define yourself.

One data layer, Four ways in

Rest API

Live query

Watcher Webhook

push on change

Bulk dataset

monthly

Claude / MCP

plain language

Delivery that fits your stack.

You reach the data through APIs, Watcher webhooks, and bulk datasets. It also runs inside Claude through MCP, so you can work with live data in plain language.

One data layer, Four ways in

Rest API

Live query

Watcher Webhook

push on change

Bulk dataset

monthly

Claude / MCP

plain language

Delivery that fits your stack.

You reach the data through APIs, Watcher webhooks, and bulk datasets. It also runs inside Claude through MCP, so you can work with live data in plain language.

Recruiting, ouT of the box

Skills in claude

candidate sourcing · contact enrichment · market map

Job Change detected

watcher

Open to work

availability

Your scoring

200+ fields

Built for recruiting.

Ready-made recruiting skills run in Claude on live Crustdata data, so sourcing, enrichment, and market mapping work without building anything first. Watchers flag job changes, content activity, and availability signals like an open-to-work status. And the scoring is yours: rank candidates on the criteria you hire against, on 200+ data points, rather than on a rank someone else fixed for you.

Recruiting, ouT of the box

Skills in claude

candidate sourcing · contact enrichment · market map

Job Change detected

watcher

Open to work

availability

Your scoring

200+ fields

Built for recruiting.

Ready-made recruiting skills run in Claude on live Crustdata data, so sourcing, enrichment, and market mapping work without building anything first. Watchers flag job changes, content activity, and availability signals like an open-to-work status. And the scoring is yours: rank candidates on the criteria you hire against, on 200+ data points, rather than on a rank someone else fixed for you.

04 · Data freshness

Data freshness: live data vs aggregated profiles

Crustdata keeps candidate and company data continuously refreshed in real time, so results reflect the current state when you search.

Day 6 · takes a new job

Acme · Senior Eng

Nubank · Staff Eng · open to work

current

still says Acme · Senior Eng

24 Days behind

Acme · Senior Eng

Day 14 · you search

crustdata • Live

aggregated store - Refreshed on a cycle

Day 0

Day 10

Day 20

Day 30

Refresh

One month refresh cycle

Day 6 · takes a new job

Acme · Senior Eng

Nubank · Staff Eng · open to work

current

still says Acme · Senior Eng

24 Days behind

Acme · Senior Eng

Day 14 · you search

crustdata • Live

aggregated store - Refreshed on a cycle

Day 0

Day 10

Day 20

Day 30

Refresh

One month refresh cycle

Day 6 · takes a new job

Acme · Senior Eng

Nubank · Staff Eng · open to work

current

still says Acme · Senior Eng

24 Days behind

Acme · Senior Eng

Day 14 · you search

crustdata • Live

aggregated store - Refreshed on a cycle

Day 0

Day 10

Day 20

Day 30

Refresh

One month refresh cycle

Same candidate, same 30 days. One record moves when they do; the other waits for the next refresh.

Same candidate, same 30 days. One record moves when they do; the other waits for the next refresh.

An aggregated profile database is a store that gets refreshed on a cycle, so a record is only as current as the last refresh. Real-time data is current at the moment you query it. Crustdata's API delivers live signals, while its bulk datasets refresh monthly, so a team picks the freshness that fits the job.

An aggregated profile database is a store that gets refreshed on a cycle, so a record is only as current as the last refresh. Real-time data is current at the moment you query it. Crustdata's API delivers live signals, while its bulk datasets refresh monthly, so a team picks the freshness that fits the job.

An aggregated profile database is a store that gets refreshed on a cycle, so a record is only as current as the last refresh. Real-time data is current at the moment you query it. Crustdata's API delivers live signals, while its bulk datasets refresh monthly, so a team picks the freshness that fits the job.

This matters more in recruiting than in almost any other use case. Role changes, availability, and emails and phone numbers move quickly, and reaching someone on the first day beats reaching them weeks later. That is the heart of how real-time data changes sourcing.

This matters more in recruiting than in almost any other use case. Role changes, availability, and emails and phone numbers move quickly, and reaching someone on the first day beats reaching them weeks later. That is the heart of how real-time data changes sourcing.

This matters more in recruiting than in almost any other use case. Role changes, availability, and emails and phone numbers move quickly, and reaching someone on the first day beats reaching them weeks later. That is the heart of how real-time data changes sourcing.

Dimension

Dimension

Crustdata

Crustdata

Juicebox

Juicebox

Data model

Data model

Real-time people and company data, plus monthly-refreshed bulk datasets.

Real-time people and company data, plus monthly-refreshed bulk datasets.

Aggregated profile database of 800M+ profiles from 30+ sources.

Aggregated profile database of 800M+ profiles from 30+ sources.

Update cadence

Update cadence

Real-time signals through the API. Monthly refresh for bulk datasets.

Real-time signals through the API. Monthly refresh for bulk datasets.

?

?

Not published by Juicebox.

Not published by Juicebox.

Build on it (API, webhooks, MCP)

Build on it (API, webhooks, MCP)

Yes. APIs, Watcher webhooks, and MCP in Claude.

Yes. APIs, Watcher webhooks, and MCP in Claude.

No. Used through its search interface.

No. Used through its search interface.

Freshness alerts (job change, availability)

Freshness alerts (job change, availability)

Yes. Talent-movement watchlists.

Yes. Talent-movement watchlists.

?

?

Not documented.

Not documented.

05 · Claude + MCP

Build your own sourcing workflow with Crustdata and Claude

Crustdata runs inside Claude through MCP, so a recruiting team can build a custom sourcing workflow on its data without adapting to a vendor's interface.

Crustdata runs inside Claude through MCP, so a recruiting team can build a custom sourcing workflow on its data without adapting to a vendor's interface.

Claude

Claude

Claude

Opus 4.8

Opus 4.8

Opus 4.8

Find senior perception engineers at robotics and autonomy startups who have shipped on real hardware. Rank them on my scoring, and flag anyone who just moved or is open to work.

Find senior perception engineers at robotics and autonomy startups who have shipped on real hardware. Rank them on my scoring, and flag anyone who just moved or is open to work.

Find senior perception engineers at robotics and autonomy startups who have shipped on real hardware. Rank them on my scoring, and flag anyone who just moved or is open to work.

Crustdata

Crustdata

Crustdata

candidate-sourcing

candidate-sourcing

candidate-sourcing

searched 1B+ profiles · 612 matches

searched 1B+ profiles · 612 matches

searched 1B+ profiles · 612 matches

Crustdata

Crustdata

Crustdata

watchers

watchers

watchers

job-change and open-to-work signals attached · 37 moved this quarter

job-change and open-to-work signals attached · 37 moved this quarter

job-change and open-to-work signals attached · 37 moved this quarter

Crustdata

Crustdata

Crustdata

contact-enrichment

contact-enrichment

contact-enrichment

54 ranked on your scoring · 49 work emails found

54 ranked on your scoring · 49 work emails found

54 ranked on your scoring · 49 work emails found

Candidate

Candidate

Candidate

Signal

Signal

Signal

Contact

Contact

Contact

PN

PN

PN

Priya N.

Priya N.

Priya N.

Staff Perception Engineer · autonomy startup

Staff Perception Engineer · autonomy startup

Staff Perception Engineer · autonomy startup

open to work

open to work

open to work

priya@…

priya@…

priya@…

DR

DR

DR

Daniel R.

Daniel R.

Daniel R.

Senior Robotics SWE · drone delivery

Senior Robotics SWE · drone delivery

Senior Robotics SWE · drone delivery

changed job 3w ago

changed job 3w ago

changed job 3w ago

daniel@…

daniel@…

daniel@…

SM

SM

SM

Sofia M.

Sofia M.

Sofia M.

ML Engineer, Perception · AV hardware

ML Engineer, Perception · AV hardware

ML Engineer, Perception · AV hardware

5 yrs on real hardware

5 yrs on real hardware

5 yrs on real hardware

sofia@…

sofia@…

sofia@…

AK

AK

AK

Aaron K.

Aaron K.

Aaron K.

Lead Controls Engineer · humanoid robotics

Lead Controls Engineer · humanoid robotics

Lead Controls Engineer · humanoid robotics

open to work

open to work

open to work

aaron@…

aaron@…

aaron@…

Showing 4 of 54 · full list written to your sheet

Showing 4 of 54 · full list written to your sheet

Showing 4 of 54 · full list written to your sheet

+

+

+

Narrow to people within 30 miles of the office…

Narrow to people within 30 miles of the office…

Narrow to people within 30 miles of the office…

MCP, short for Model Context Protocol, is the connection that lets Claude work directly with Crustdata's data. In practice, someone who is not an engineer can describe a sourcing workflow in plain language and run it on top of live data. You set the filters, the scoring, and the output, so the data fits your process instead of the reverse. A two-person agency did exactly this, and their story is next.

MCP, short for Model Context Protocol, is the connection that lets Claude work directly with Crustdata's data. In practice, someone who is not an engineer can describe a sourcing workflow in plain language and run it on top of live data. You set the filters, the scoring, and the output, so the data fits your process instead of the reverse. A two-person agency did exactly this, and their story is next.

06 · Proof

How The Firm switched off Juicebox and grew sourcing capacity 50%

Crustdata runs inside Claude through MCP, so a recruiting team can build a custom sourcing workflow on its data without adapting to a vendor's interface.

+50%

+50%

sourcing capacity, no new hire

700+ → 50–60

700+ → 50–60

noisy results narrowed to high-confidence candidates

~2.5 hrs

~2.5 hrs

a full-day search, now

Using Crustdata and Claude, a two-person recruiting agency, The Firm, increased its sourcing capacity by 50% without hiring, cutting more than 700 noisy results down to 50-60 high-confidence candidates.

Using Crustdata and Claude, a two-person recruiting agency, The Firm, increased its sourcing capacity by 50% without hiring, cutting more than 700 noisy results down to 50-60 high-confidence candidates.

The Firm is a two-person agency working in robotics, hardware, and machine learning. They moved off Juicebox and onto a custom Claude skill built on Crustdata's APIs, so their sourcing ran on live data and their own scoring rather than inside a fixed interface.

The Firm is a two-person agency working in robotics, hardware, and machine learning. They moved off Juicebox and onto a custom Claude skill built on Crustdata's APIs, so their sourcing ran on live data and their own scoring rather than inside a fixed interface.

Most of that gain came from speed and focus. A search that used to take a full day now takes about 2.5 hours, which freed the same two people to take on more work without adding a third.

Most of that gain came from speed and focus. A search that used to take a full day now takes about 2.5 hours, which freed the same two people to take on more work without adding a third.

We literally find reasons to say no to people before we work with them. With this workflow, I can take on two or three more clients easily. That's $40,000 to $60,000 a month we've probably had to turn away because we didn't have the capacity.

We literally find reasons to say no to people before we work with them. With this workflow, I can take on two or three more clients easily. That's $40,000 to $60,000 a month we've probably had to turn away because we didn't have the capacity.

Mike Cannon | Co-Founder, The Firm

Read the full case study →

07 · Pricing

What it costs: Juicebox vs Crustdata pricing

Crustdata is priced on usage through credit-based API access and bulk datasets, rather than on a per-seat subscription like Juicebox.

Juicebox

Per seat

Free

$0

Starter

$119 / seat / mo

Starter, billed yearly

$99 / seat / mo

Growth

$199 / seat / mo

Growth, billed yearly

$179 / seat / mo

Business

Custom

Agents add-on

$199 / agent / mo

Juicebox

Per seat

Free

$0

Starter

$119 / seat / mo

Starter, billed yearly

$99 / seat / mo

Growth

$199 / seat / mo

Growth, billed yearly

$179 / seat / mo

Business

Custom

Agents add-on

$199 / agent / mo

Crustdata

Usage-based

Model

Credit-based API access

Start

Free tier

Baseline data

Bulk datasets

Add-ons

None

Scales with

Volume of data used

Seats

Not what you pay for

The two pricing models are built differently. Crustdata charges on usage, so you pay for the volume of enrichments and searches you run, with bulk datasets available for baseline data and a free tier to start. Juicebox charges per seat, with an optional per-agent add-on, so the bill grows with the size of the team.

The two pricing models are built differently. Crustdata charges on usage, so you pay for the volume of enrichments and searches you run, with bulk datasets available for baseline data and a free tier to start. Juicebox charges per seat, with an optional per-agent add-on, so the bill grows with the size of the team.

As a team scales, the trade-off is clear. You are either paying for more seats on an interface or for the data you actually use.

As a team scales, the trade-off is clear. You are either paying for more seats on an interface or for the data you actually use.

Dimension

Dimension

Juicebox

Juicebox

Crustdata

Crustdata

Model

Model

Per seat. Free $0. Starter $119 per seat monthly ($99 billed yearly). Growth $199 per seat monthly ($179 billed yearly). Business custom.

Per seat. Free $0. Starter $119 per seat monthly ($99 billed yearly). Growth $199 per seat monthly ($179 billed yearly). Business custom.

Usage-based, credit-based API access with a free tier to start, plus bulk datasets.

Usage-based, credit-based API access with a free tier to start, plus bulk datasets.

Add-ons

Add-ons

Agents add-on: $199 per agent monthly.

Agents add-on: $199 per agent monthly.

None; you pay for the data you use.

None; you pay for the data you use.

Scales with

Scales with

Number of seats and agents.

Number of seats and agents.

Volume of data used.

Volume of data used.

Best suits

Best suits

Small fixed teams wanting a search interface.

Small fixed teams wanting a search interface.

Teams scaling sourcing, or building on live data.

Teams scaling sourcing, or building on live data.

08 · Fit check

Who should switch from Juicebox to Crustdata (and who shouldn't)

Switch to Crustdata if any of these describe your team.

You have hit the ceiling of a search interface and want to shape the data yourself.

You have hit the ceiling of a search interface and want to shape the data yourself.

You want to build sourcing into your own workflow, with or without engineers, through Claude.

You want to build sourcing into your own workflow, with or without engineers, through Claude.

You need current, real-time data that reflects the moment you search.

You need current, real-time data that reflects the moment you search.

You are scaling, and per-seat cost is starting to bite.

You are scaling, and per-seat cost is starting to bite.

You want a plug-and-play search interface, no build

You want a plug-and-play search interface, no build

A search tool like Juicebox

You need current, real-time data

You need current, real-time data

Crustdata

You want to build sourcing into your own workflow

You want to build sourcing into your own workflow

Crustdata

You are scaling and per-seat cost is biting

You are scaling and per-seat cost is biting

Crustdata

You want plain-English search and control of the data

You want plain-English search and control of the data

Crustdata, via Claude and MCP

For most growing recruiting teams, the move is worth making. When your sourcing runs on live data and your own scoring, you get more done with the same people, and you stop paying by the seat for a search box you have outgrown.

You can also compare the other alternatives first before you decide.

Ready to source on live data instead of inside a search box?

See how a recruiting team builds its own sourcing on Crustdata, with or without engineers.

FAQ